United States v. Jorge Cisneros

Good Law
826 F.3d 1190·2016 WL 3435389·2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11305
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 201613-30066California2,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

Jorge Armando Cisneros appeals the district court’s decision to sentence him to a mandatory-minimum sentence of fifteen years in prison under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). See 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(1). Cisneros does not have “three previous convictions” that qualify as “a violent felony or a serious drug offense” under ACCA. Id. Accordingly, we vacate Cisneros’s sentence and remand to the district court for resentencing.

I.

Under ACCA, a defendant convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g) faces a fifteen-year mandatory-minimum sentence if he “has three previous convictions ... for a violent felony or a serious drug offense, or both.” Id. § 922(e)(1). ACCA defines “serious drug offense” as follows:

Id. § 924(e)(2)(A). ACCA also defines “violent felony”:

Id. § 924(e)(2)(B).

At the time the district court sentenced Cisneros, a prior conviction also qualified as a violent felony if it “otherwise involve[d] conduct that presented a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(2)(B)(ii). We previously relied on this “residual clause” to affirm Cisneros’s sentence. See United States v. Cisneros, 763 F.3d 1236 (9th Cir. 2014). However,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.