People v. Williamson CA4/1

STATEMENT OF FACTS

In his change of plea, Appellant admitted that he threw a glass bottle that hit a car

and that it was capable of inflicting great bodily injury.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has not identified any reasonably arguable

issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel has asked this court to review the record for error

as mandated by Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436. In compliance with Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) and in order to assist the court in its review, appellate

counsel has identified the following possible, but not arguable issue:

Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to reduce the

conviction to a misdemeanor.

2 We have reviewed the entire record as mandated by Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436

and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738. We have not been able to identify any reasonably

arguable issue for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Appellant on

this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

NARES, J.

AARON, J.

3