United States v. Titus Bryant

Good Law
653 F. App'x 503
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 201615-30179California332 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Titus Mark Bryant appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 60-month sentence and a special condition of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for three counts of assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113 (a)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm the sentence, vacate the special condition of supervised release, and remand for further proceedings.

Bryant contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his post-offense rehabilitation. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The above-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Bryant’s criminal history, the need to protect the public, and the seriousness of the offense. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 .

Bryant also contends, and the government concedes, that remand is required because the district court failed to provide advance notice of its intent to impose a special condition of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.