Khodayari

Khodayari v. Ardalan CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 2016B262916California1,947 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/22/16 Khodayari v. Ardalan CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

BAHMAN KHODAYARI, B262916

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC090227) v.

PEZHMAN CHRISTOPHER ARDALAN

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Frank Johnson, Judge. Affirmed. Bahman Khodayari, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Offices of Mark K. Drew and Mark K. Drew for Defendants and Respondents. Some three years ago we decided an appeal between the same parties, over the same dispute. (Khodayari v. Ardalan (April 10, 2013, B239102) [nonpub. opn.]; “previous opinion.”) In that case, appellant sought…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.