ARI-PFOP 1 v. Hirschler Fleischer CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 23, 2016G050857California7,981 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/23/16 ARI-PFOP 1 v. Hirschler Fleischer CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ARI-PFOP 1, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, G050857

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00552486)

HIRSCHLER FLEISCHER, ACP et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gail Andrea Andler, Judge. Affirmed. Catanzarite Law Corporation, Kenneth J. Catanzarite, Nicole M. Catanzarite-Woodward and Eric V. Anderton for Plaintiffs and Appellants. LINER, Maribeth Annaguey and Kathryn L. McCann for Defendant and Respondent CBRE, Inc. Brown Rudnick and Joel S. Miliband; Berkowitz Oliver Williams Shaw &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.