People v. Walters CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2016D069197California170 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Walters's appointed counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal of the judgment, but asks

this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738. To assist our review, counsel

cites Anders v. California and refers to whether Walters's plea was voluntary and whether

counsel provided effective assistance.

We granted Walters permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but

he has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably

arguable appellate issues. Walters has been competently represented by counsel on this

appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

McDONALD, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

O'ROURKE, J.

Prager, J.*

* Judge of the San Diego Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. 3