People v. Martinez CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2016H041273California3,822 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

An information charged defendant Ricky Martinez with one count of oral copulation or sexual penetration with a child 10 years of age or younger (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (b); count 1) and two counts of lewd or lascivious conduct on a child under the age of 14 by force, violence, duress, menace, or fear (Pen. § 288, subd. (b)(1); count 2 and count 3.) A jury convicted defendant on counts 1 and 2 and acquitted him on count 3. The trial court sentenced defendant to a prison term of 15 years to life consecutive to six years. Defendant now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Defendant makes four arguments in favor of reversal: 1) the trial court erred in admitting opinion testimony regarding his guilt and the victim’s credibility; 2) the trial court erred in failing to give a limiting instruction pertaining to that opinion testimony; 3) defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to ensure that the trial court gave a limiting instruction regarding the opinion testimony; and 4) cumulative error warrants reversal. As set forth below, we affirm.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

The victim named in the information was Cessaria Doe.1 Defendant is a cousin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.