A. J. Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States District Court for the Central District of California

Good Law
503 F.2d 384·19 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 29·1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6909
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 197473-3584California2,927 words

Opinion

Opinion

Neill, J.

Petitioner filed this petition for a Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition requesting this Court to direct respondent to vacate its order transferring petitioner’s suit against Chesapeake Industries, Inc. to the District of Delaware. In support of the petition it is contended Delaware is not a district where the action “might have been brought” under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a). Further, that even if an ability to raise the subject matter of the lawsuit by counterclaim in the transferee district is generally sufficient to satisfy the statute, transfer would be improper in this instance as A.J. could only have made such a counterclaim in Delaware with leave of the court. Further, petitioner asserts that respondent should not have considered the pendency of the Delaware action in deciding the transfer motion. The final contention is a claim that respondent abused its discretion in granting the motion to transfer.

In August, 1971, petitioner and Chesapeake Industries, Inc. entered into an agreement for the sale by petitioner to Chesapeake of the shares of Jessup Door Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of petitioner. Chesapeake gave petitioner a promissory note for the purchase price.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.