People v. Rangel CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2016B258940California7,199 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/27/16 P. v. Rangel CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THE PEOPLE, B258940

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA127879) v.

JOSE RANGEL et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ricardo R. Ocampo, Judge. Affirmed as modified. Robert D Bacon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Jose Rangel. Brett Harding Duxbury, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Jesus Hernandez. Danalynn Pritz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Enrique Hernandez. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.