People v. Reisweig CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2016C080075California3,695 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

Filed 6/27/16 P. v. Reisweig CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

THE PEOPLE, C080075

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SF130576B)

v.

BRAD REISWIG,

Defendant and Appellant.

After the motion to suppress the evidence against him was denied, defendant Brad Reiswig pled no contest to possessing for sale a controlled substance. The court placed him on informal probation for five years. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) we should review the police personnel records considered by the trial court its in-camera review, and if appropriate, order them produced; and (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. As to the second issue, he contends his detention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.