People v. Crunk CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2016A143097California3,145 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/27/16 P. v. Crunk CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A143097

v. KASEY ROBERT CRUNK, (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCR647867) Defendant and Appellant.

Kasey Robert Crunk challenges the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences for two offenses arising out of Crunk’s flight from a police officer. Crunk contends the consecutive sentences violate Penal Code section 654 (section 654) because, he claims, the offenses were part of a single, indivisible course of conduct and were temporally proximate. We have reviewed the record, and we conclude the trial court’s finding that the offenses were separate is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we will affirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.