People v. George F.

Good Law
2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 518·203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 607·248 Cal. App. 4th 734
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2016D069227California2,514 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

A petition was filed with the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleging that George F. committed a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a); count 1), and that George willfully annoyed and molested a child under the age of 18. (§ 647.6, subd. (a); count 2.) The People offered to dismiss count 1 if George admitted to count 2. George admitted to count 2 and the juvenile court found a factual basis for that admission. The court then granted the People’s motion to dismiss count 1, declared George a ward of the court, and ordered him to juvenile probation on various terms and conditions.

George appeals contending that the conditions of his probation restricting his use of electronics or requiring the submission of those electronics to search are (1) invalid under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481 [ 124 Cal.Rptr. 905 , 541 P.2d 545 ] (Lent) and (2) unconstitutionally overbroad. We disagree.

FACTS

The juvenile court found the following factual basis for George’s admission: ”[0]n or about January 4th of 2014, George did willfully, unlawfully annoy, [and] molest [a child], who was six years old at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.