People v. Cano CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
The facts of the offense are not relevant to our resolution of the issue presented on
appeal, and were set out in full in our opinion on defendant’s direct appeal (People v.
2 Cano, (April 2, 2004, E033115) [nonpub. opn.]), so we do no recite them here. Suffice it
to say that the charges arise from gang-related shootings that killed one person, and
injured another, at a birthday party. (People v. Cano, supra, E033115, pp. 3-4].)
Defendant was tried by a jury and convicted of one count of first degree murder
(Pen. Code, § 187,1 subd. (a), count 1), two counts of discharging a firearm at an
inhabited dwelling house (§ 246, counts 2 & 3), three counts of assault with a
semiautomatic firearm (§ 245, subd. (b), counts 4, 5, 10), and one count of possession of
a semiautomatic firearm by an ex-felon.2 (Former § 12021, subd, (a)(1), count 6.) As to
count one, the jury found true a special allegation that the murder was committed for the
benefit of a criminal street gang, within the meaning of section 190.2, subdivision
(a)(22), as well as a separate gang enhancement pursuant to section 186.22, subdivision
(b)(1), and that defendant personally discharged a firearm…