People v. McKneialy CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2016B266844California2,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

I. Overview of section 1170.126

In November 2012, voters in California approved Proposition 36, which enacted section 1170.126. That statute established a procedure under which a defendant serving an indeterminate life sentence as a third strike offender for a non-serious or non-violent felony that was a strike under the pre-Proposition 36 version of the Three Strikes law could file a petition for recall of sentence and request resentencing as a second strike offender for that offense. (Teal v. Superior Court (2014) 60 Cal.4th 595, 596-597.) A petitioning inmate is eligible for resentencing if all three of the following criteria set forth in section 1170.126, subdivision (e) are satisfied: “‘(1) the [inmate] is serving an indeterminate life sentence for a crime that is not a serious or violent felony; (2) the life sentence was not imposed for any of the offenses appearing in sections 667[, subdivision (e)(2)(C) ] and 1170.12[, subdivision (c)(2)(C)]; and (3) the inmate has no prior convictions for any of the offenses appearing in clause (iv) of section 667[, subdivision (e)(2)(C)] or section clause (iv) of section 1170.12[, subdivision (c)(2)(C)].’ [Citation.]”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.