Scott

Scott v. Yoho

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2016B265641MCalifornia6,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants, Robert A. Yoho, M.D. and New Body Cosmetic Surgery Center, appeal from a June 18, 2015 order denying their motions to compel arbitration. Defendants seek to enforce three arbitration agreements signed by the decedent, Kenisha Parker, against plaintiffs, who are her relatives. Plaintiffs are: Vivian Scott, individually and as guardian ad litem for a minor, D.G.; S.T., a minor; and La’Joyce King. Robert Lee Turner, Jr. is the guardian ad litem of S.T. Defendants argue the three arbitration agreements are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act. We conclude: the three arbitration agreements are subject to limited preemptive effect of the Federal Arbitration Act; the 30-day rescission right in Code of Civil Procedure1 section 1295, subdivision (c) is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act; and thus the motions to compel arbitration should have been granted. We reverse the order denying the motions to compel arbitration.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Allegations of the First Amended Complaint and Defendants’ Answer

Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint alleges causes of action for wrongful death, medical malpractice and survivorship. Ms. Parker consulted with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.