R.C.
R.C. v. P.C. CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 6/28/16 R.C. v. P.C. CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
R.C.,
Appellant, G051519
v. (Super. Ct. No. 12P001259)
P.C., OPINION
Intervener and Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Salvador Sarmiento, Judge. Affirmed. R.C., in pro. per., for Appellant. Law Offices of Jeffrey W. Doeringer for Intervener and Respondent. The issue in this family law case is whether the court abused its discretion by denying R.C.’s (Father) petition for legal and physical custody of his son Michael C. (Michael). Father complains the court ignored the fact his due process rights were…