Hertzka & Knowles v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
503 F.2d 625·87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2503·1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6836
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 197473-2971California2,888 words

Opinion

Opinion

Choy, J.

This case arises out of a labor dispute at Hertzka & Knowles, a medium-sized architectural firm located in San Francisco. In September of 1971 its professional employees voted to have the Organization of Architectural Employees (OAE) as their bargaining agent. After months of negotiations failed to produce an agreement with management, one of the then 25 employees in the bargaining unit petitioned the National Labor Relations Board to decertify OAE. The Board set an election for December 6, 1972.

Prior to the election, management representatives spoke to the employees on several occasions. What occurred at a December 1st meeting formed the basis for OAE charges, filed with the Board after the election, that Hertzka & Knowles violated § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act by allegedly making certain threats of reprisal.

OAE lost the election by a vote of 14 against continuing representation and 11 for.

Immediately after the election, a meeting attended by both the employees and the partners of the firm produced a new plan for employee bargaining. It called for five in-house committees with each to be composed of five employees and one management representative.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.