People v. Shells CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 2016B269286California557 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, “created a postconviction release proceeding whereby a prisoner who is serving an indeterminate life sentence imposed pursuant to the [T]hree [S]trikes law for a crime that is not a serious or violent felony and who is not disqualified, may have his or her sentenced recalled and be sentenced as a second strike offender unless the court determines that resentencing would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety. (§ 1170.126.)” (People v. Yearwood (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 161, 168.) An inmate currently serving an indeterminate life sentence pursuant to the Three Strikes law is disqualified from resentencing if he has an enumerated disqualifying factor set forth in section 1170.126, subdivision (e). (People v. Hicks (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 275, 282.) One of the disqualifying factors is if “[d]uring the commission of the current offense, the defendant used a firearm, was armed with a firearm or deadly weapon, or intended to cause great bodily injury to another person.” (§§ 667, subd. (e)(2)(C)(iii), 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)(C)(iii).) The phrase “during the commission of the current offense” “requires a temporal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.