Pirouzian

Pirouzian v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 5th 438·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 566·204 Cal. Rptr. 3d 539
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 2016B266015California4,457 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rothschild, J.

The Medical Board of California (the Board) revoked Amir Pirouzian, M.D.’s medical license. Dr. Pirouzian filed a petition in the superior court for a writ of administrative mandamus to set aside the Board’s decision, which the trial court denied. Dr. Pirouzian then filed a petition for writ of mandate in this court. We requested opposition and notified the parties of our intention to issue a peremptory writ. (See Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 180 [ 203 Cal.Rptr. 626 , 681 P.2d 893 ] (Palma).) We now grant the petition.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Board granted a medical license to Dr. Pirouzian in 1996. Before the actions that gave rise to this proceeding, Dr. Pirouzian had no record of disciplinary action against him. It is undisputed that he is, as the administrative law judge (ALJ) found, “a highly skilled, competent physician and surgeon who has never been found responsible for causing any patient harm.”

In 2006, Dr. Pirouzian began working as a pediatric ophthalmologist at Children’s Specialists of San Diego (CSSD). CSSD provided him with a group disability insurance plan from Northwestern Mutual. Dr. Pirouzian purchased…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.