Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Brimberry

Good Law
653 F. App'x 561
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 201614-56209California336 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

P. Kellie Brimberry appeals the district court’s ruling that she is entitled to only $375,000 in basic accidental death coverage as the beneficiary of her deceased husband’s ERISA life-insurance plan. On appeal, she contends that Prudential was obligated to pay $1 million in basic accidental death coverage, the sum of her basic term life and optional term life awards, because of various alleged ambiguities in the plan. The district court correctly interpreted the language of the provision in the plan governing basic accidental death. On de novo review, we affirm. See Babikian v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 63 F.3d 837, 839 (9th Cir. 1995).

The explicit language of the contested provision states, in relevant part, that the amount payable for basic accidental death benefits is “equal to the amount for which you are insured under the Basic Employee Term Life Coverage.” The parties have stipulated that the amount payable for basic employee term life coverage is $375,000. Because this contractual language is “clear and explicit and does not lead to an absurd result, we ascertain [the parties’] intent from the written provisions and go no further.” See Helfand v. Nat’l Union…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.