Shimada

Shimada v. Nakamura Air Express CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2016B264670California3,459 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/30/16 Shimada v. Nakamura Air Express CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

SHINJI SHIMADA, B264670

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YC068995) v.

NAKAMURA AIR EXPRESS (USA),

INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ramona G. See, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Law Offices of Joseph F. Hart and Joseph F. Hart for Plaintiff and Appellant. Fehmel & Associates and T. Michael Fehmel for Defendant and Respondent.

______________________________ Shinji Shimada appeals from the adverse judgment in a wage and hour case he filed against respondent Nakamura Air Express (USA), Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.