People v. Naegele CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2016B255370ACalifornia2,792 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 6/30/16 P. v. Naegele CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B255370 (Super. Ct. No. F441746) Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Luis Obispo County)

v. OPINION ON REHEARING

KURT DUNCAN NAEGELE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Kurt Duncan Naegele appeals from restitution orders imposed as a condition of his probation following his no contest plea to gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated (Pen. Code, § 191.5, subd. (a)),1 driving while under the influence of alcohol and causing injury (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (a)), and driving with a 0.08 percent or higher blood alcohol…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.