Johnson v. The Cricket Co. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2016A144580California2,479 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Filed 6/30/16 Johnson v. The Cricket Co. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

TRACEY JOHNSON,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A144580

v. THE CRICKET COMPANY, LLC, (Humboldt County Super. Ct. No. DR080375) Defendant and Respondent.

This is the second appeal in this matter. We opened our opinion on the first appeal with this description of the underlying action: “Plaintiff Tracey Johnson, the owner of a hair salon, was cutting a customer’s hair using a pair of scissors manufactured by defendant The Cricket Company (Cricket) when she suffered injuries allegedly caused by the defective design and manufacture of the scissors, and the deceptive manner in which it was sold. She filed a complaint for damages in which she alleged seven causes of action,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.