Chang

Chang v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 5th 25·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 539·204 Cal. Rptr. 3d 293
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 1, 2016B261194California4,581 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kriegler, J.

A public entity employer provided a defense for three employees under a reservation of rights, then refused to pay the resulting judgment for battery and civil rights violations on the ground that the employees acted with actual malice. The employees sought indemnification from their employer under Government Code section 825. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the employees. On appeal, the public entity contends that because the defense was conducted under a reservation of rights, the employees had to satisfy the requirements of section 825.2 for indemnification. We hold that section 825.2 applies when a public entity employer provides a defense under a reservation of rights that includes reservation of the right not to indemnify for acts committed with actual fraud, corruption or actual malice. An employer’s reservation of the right to indemnity from the employee for acts committed with actual fraud, corruption or actual malice is necessarily a reservation of the right not to indemnify the employee for such acts. We reverse the judgment with directions.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On November 5, 2007, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Deputies David…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.