Kingswood v. Michelman

Good Law
504 F.2d 1108
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 197472-2100California259 words

Opinion

Opinion

504 F.2d 1108 In the Matter of George Walter Kingswood and Gerd Kingswood, Bankrupts. George Walter KINGSWOOD and Gerd Kingswood, Appellants, v. Carlyle MICHELMAN, Trustee-Appellee. No. 72-2100. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Oct. 17, 1974. Stephen R. Wolfson (argued), Moneymaker & Wolfson, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants. Joel K. Mithers (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for trustee-appellee. Before BARNES, KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges. OPINION ON REMAND PER CURIAM: 1 Our original opinion in the subject cause is reported at 470 F.2d 996 (case 2) (9th Cir. 1972). We based our brief reversing opinion upon the opinion of a District Court in a similar case, thought by us to be well reasoned. In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (N.D.Cal.), aff'd 470 F.2d 996 (case 1) (9th Cir. 1972). 2 The Supreme Court has now reversed our opinion. Michelman, Trustee, etc. v. Kingswood, 418 U.S. 902 , 94 S.Ct. 3191 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1974). The Supreme Court's mandate has now been received by our court and recites that the cause 'is hereby, remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Kokoszka v. Belford, 417 U.S. 642 , 94…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.