United States v. Carl Melvin Burnett, United States of America v. Darrell Lester Sears, United States of America v. Robert Bernard Lyon, United States of America v. Carl Louis Moline

Good Law
505 F.2d 815
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 197574-1647California809 words

Opinion

Opinion

505 F.2d 815 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Melvin BURNETT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell Lester SEARS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Bernard LYON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Louis MOLINE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 74-1647 to 74-1650. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 13. 1974 Certiorari Denied March 3, 1975 See 95 S.Ct. 1361 . Kenneth L. Collins (argued) of Federal Public Defenders, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Earl E. Boyd, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued) Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Myron Roschko, Beverly Hills, Cal., on brief, for Carl Melvin Burnett. Alvin S. Michaelson, Los Angeles, Cal., on brief, for Robert Bernard Lyon. Ron Bain, Los Angeles, Cal., on brief, for Carl Louis Moline. OPINION Before TRASK and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, 1 District judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellants were charged under a 40-count indictment with conspiracy to commit offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001 and the substantive violations of that section. Count One charged the conspiracy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.