Ralph W. Keith and Esther May Keith, Husband and Wife v. California Highway Commission, Ralph W. Keith and Esther May Keith, Husband and Wife v. Claude S. Brinegar, as Secretary of Transportation

Good Law
506 F.2d 696
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 197572-3072California1,485 words

Opinion

Opinion

506 F.2d 696 4 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,809 Ralph W. KEITH and Esther May Keith, husband and wife, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY COMMISSION et al., Defendants-Appellants. Ralph W. KEITH and Esther May Keith, husband and wife, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Claude S. BRINEGAR, as Secretary of Transportation, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 72-3072. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 27, 1974 Certiorari Denied Jan. 27, 1975 See 95 S.Ct. 826 . Robert V. Cohune (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., Joseph A. Montoya (argued), Dept. of Public Works, Legal Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Fredric P. Sutherland (argued), the Center for Law in the Public Interest, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Royal M. Sorensen (argued), Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae. Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL, KOELSCH, BROWNING, DUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, TRASK, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges. OPINION DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: 1 We elected to hear this case in banc, together with Lathan v. Brinegar, 9 Cir., 506 F.2d 677 , also decided today, to consider whether the court erred in enjoining further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.