Brannon v. Warn Bros.

Good Law
508 F.2d 115
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 197473-1367California2,718 words

Opinion

Opinion

508 F.2d 115 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2084 , 75 Lab.Cas. P 10,580 Joseph E. BRANNON, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellee, v. WARN BROS., INC., a California corporation, Individually and doing business as Crescent Truck Lines, et al., Defendants-Petitioners-Appellants, No. 73-1367. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 29, 1974. Richard H. Harding (argued), Littler, Mendelson & Fastiff, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-petitioners-appellants. Eugene B. Shapiro (argued), Shapiro & Maguire Law Corp., Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-respondent-appellee. Before ELY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, * District judge. OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 After two separate grievance proceedings, Brannon brought this action in state court against his employer, Warn Bros., Inc., dba Crescent Truck Lines, and George Warn and Frank J. Warn (collectively referred to as Crescent). After the case was removed to the federal district court, Crescent moved to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay the action pending the outcome of further grievance proceedings. Crescent appeals from the denial of these motions. We dismiss Crescent's appeal from the order denying its motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.