Newspaper and Periodical Drivers & Helpers Union, Local No. 921, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Douglas Brown v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. San Francisco Newspaper Printing Company, Inc.

Good Law
509 F.2d 99
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 197473--3595California634 words

Opinion

Opinion

509 F.2d 99 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2273 , 75 Lab.Cas. P 10,567 NEWSPAPER AND PERIODICAL DRIVERS & HELPERS UNION, LOCAL NO. 921, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Douglas BROWN et al., Cross-Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER PRINTING COMPANY, INC., Respondent. Nos. 73--3595 to 73--3597. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 23, 1974. Kenneth N. Silbert (argued), Burndage, Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner Union (No. 73--3595). Timothy H. Fine (argued) and G. Joseph Bertain, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for cross-petitioners newspaper dealers (No. 73--3596). David L. Bacon (argued), Cooper, White & Cooper, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Company (No. 73--3597). Joseph Thackery, NLRB, Washington, D.C. (argued), for N.L.R.B. in all cases. Before CHAMBERS and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. * OPINION PER CURIAM: 1 Before the court are the respective petitions of Newspaper & Periodical Drivers &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.