Trout Unlimited v. Morton
Opinion
Opinion
509 F.2d 1276 7 ERC 1321 , 5 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,151 TROUT UNLIMITED et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Randy Berry, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. Rogers C. B. MORTON, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and Fremont-Madison Irrigation District and Madison County, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, Defendants-Intervenors Appellees. No. 74--1974. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 23, 1974. Allen W. Stokes, Jr. (argued), of Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc., Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs-appellants. Neil Proto (argued), Appellate Sections, Lands and Natural Resources Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees. William S. Holden, Esq. (argued), Idaho Falls, Idaho, for defendants-intervenors. Before KILKENNY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, GRAY, * District Judge. OPINION SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellants appeal from a judgment holding the environmental impact statement for the Teton Dam and Reservoir Project adequate under the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 4321 et seq., and denying injunctive relief against further construction. We…