People of the State of California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control Board v. The Environmental Protection Agency, and Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, State of Washington and Its Department of Ecology v. The Environmental Protection Agency and Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America

Good Law
511 F.2d 963
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 197574--1189California7,084 words

Opinion

Opinion

511 F.2d 963 7 ERC 1667 , 5 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,213 PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Petitioner, v. The ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. STATE OF WASHINGTON and its Department of Ecology, Petitioners, v. The ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America, Respondents. Nos. 73--2466, 73--2486 and 74--1189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 13, 1975. Certiorari Granted June 23, 1975. See 95 S.Ct. 2655 . Roderick Walston, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued) San Francisco, Cal., Charles B. Roe, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Olympia, Wash., for petitioners. Raymond W. Mushal (argued), Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondents. OPINION Before WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges and BURNS, * District Judge. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 Are federal agencies and enclaves within California and Washington required to comply with state procedural requirements with respect to control of water pollution? We hold that they are and we direct the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.