Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Data Transmission Co., Intervenors. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Opinion
Opinion
513 F.2d 1142 7 ERC 1561 WASHINGTON UTILITIES & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Data Transmission Co. et al., Intervenors. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents. Nos. 71-2919, 72-1198. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 20, 1975. James R. Cunningham, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., for Washington Utilities and Transp. Comm'n (argued), for petitioners. Charles M. Firestone, Counsel, F.C.C. (argued), Washington, D. C., Joel Davidow, Atty. Dept. of Justice (argued), for respondents. 1 Michael L. Glaser (argued), of Glaser & Fletcher, Washington, D. C., for Data Transmission. 2 William H. Borghesani, Jr. (argued), for Nat. Retail Merchants Assn., Washington, D. C., for applicants in intervention. 3 Thormund A. Miller, Gen. Counsel, Southern Pacific Communications, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for Southern Pacific Communications Co. 4 Michael H. Bader (argued), of Haley, Bader & Potts, Washington, D. C., for Interdata Communications. 5 Before BROWNING, WRIGHT…