Waldorf Brainard Brice v. Glenn Pickett
Opinion
Opinion
Barnes, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant’s petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Brice is being detained by the immigration authorities pursuant to an order of deportation following a hearing in which he was found deportable under 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(11), which provides, in part, that an alien may be deported who “at any time has been convicted of a violation of . any law or regulation relating to the illicit possession of . marijuana.”
At his deportation hearing, Brice admitted both that he is an alien and that he had been convicted in Japan on September 1, 1969, upon a plea of guilty, to the unlawful possession of marijuana. The district court found the evidence supporting the finding of deportability to be clear, convincing and unequivocal. Woodby v. INS, 385 U.S. 276 , 87 S.Ct. 483 , 17 L.Ed.2d 362 (1966). We affirm.
Brice argues that Congress did not intend 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(11) to apply to foreign convictions. The wording of that statute however strongly indicates that Congress did intend to include foreign convictions. A plain reading of “any law or regulation” would include foreign laws or regulations. Administrative decisions…