Opinion No. (2005)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralFebruary 7, 2005California2,908 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

BILL LOCKYER Attorney General SUSAN DUNCAN LEE Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE TOM HARMAN, MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. Where voters of a charter city have approved a city employee pension plan prior to July 1, 1978, but collection of a property tax to pay for the retirement benefits is delayed until after July 1, 1978, is the collection of the tax subject to the one percent tax limitation of the Constitution? 2. Where voters of a charter city have approved a retirement benefit prior to July 1, 1978, to be offered to employees after July 1, 1978, is the collection of a property tax to pay for the retirement benefit subject to the one percent property tax limitation of the Constitution? 3 Where voters of a charter city have approved different levels of retirement benefits before and after July 1, 1978, what accounting method may be used for purposes of determining which costs are not subject to the one percent property tax limitation of the Constitution? CONCLUSIONS 1. Where voters of a charter city have approved a city employee pension plan prior to July 1, 1978, but collection of a property tax to pay for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.