Opinion No. (2001)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralFebruary 20, 2001California1,355 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

BILL LOCKYER Attorney General CLAYTON P. ROCHE Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE WESLEY CHESBRO, MEMBER OF THE STATE SENATE, has requested an opinion on the following question: May a majority of the board members of a local public agency e-mail each other to develop a collective concurrence as to action to be taken by the board without violating the Ralph M. Brown Act if the e-mails are also sent to the secretary and chairperson of the agency, the e-mails are posted on the agency's Internet website, and a printed version of each e-mail is reported at the next public meeting of the board? CONCLUSION A majority of the board members of a local public agency may not e-mail each other to develop a collective concurrence as to action to be taken by the board without violating the Ralph M. Brown Act even if the e-mails are also sent to the secretary and chairperson of the agency, the e-mails are posted on the agency's Internet website, and a printed version of each e-mail is reported at the next public meeting of the board. ANALYSIS The Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code, §§ 54950 - 54962 ; "Brown Act") 1 generally requires the legislative body of a local public agency to hold…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.