Opinion No. (1997)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralSeptember 29, 1997California2,437 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ANTHONY M. SUMMERS Deputy Attorney General THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. Do members of the public have the right to address the State Board of Equalization at a taxpayer's appeal hearing? 2. May an employee of a public agency address the State Board of Equalization on behalf of the agency at a taxpayer's appeal hearing? CONCLUSION 1. Members of the public have the right to address the State Board of Equalization at a taxpayer's appeal hearing. 2. An employee of a public agency may address the State Board of Equalization on behalf of the agency at a taxpayer's appeal hearing. ANALYSIS The composition and duties of the State Board of Equalization ("Board") are found in the Constitution (Cal. Const., art XIII , §§ 17 , 19) and various statutes (see, e.g., Gov. Code, §§ 15600- 15646 ). 1 Among the statutory schemes applicable to the Board is the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (§§ 11120 - 11132 ; "Act"). The Act not only requires meetings of state agencies to be open to the public (§ 11123 ) and appropriately noticed (§ 11125 ), but also affords the public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.