Opinion No. (1998)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralMarch 17, 1998California1,616 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General GREGORY L. GONOT Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE MARTHA M. ESCUTIA, MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following question: When the retail seller of a hearing aid fails to adjust or replace the device so that it is specifically fit for the particular needs of the buyer and the transaction is deemed rescinded, may the seller retain a portion of the total amount paid on the basis that such part payment was for fitting the device or other ancillary service or for one or more of the component parts that the seller refuses to take back? CONCLUSION When the retail seller of a hearing aid fails to adjust or replace the device so that it is specifically fit for the particular needs of the buyer and the transaction is deemed rescinded, the seller may not retain any portion of the total amount paid on the basis that such part payment was for fitting the device or other ancillary service or for one or more of the component parts that the seller refuses to take back. ANALYSIS The question presented concerns the extent of the refund which must be provided to one who returns a hearing aid pursuant to Civil Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.