Opinion No. (2001)

Caution
California Attorney GeneralNovember 14, 2001California3,111 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

BILL LOCKYER Attorney General ANTHONY S. DA VIGO Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE DION ARONER, MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following question: Is a city required under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act to provide, as an accommodation for a disabled member of its city council or an advisory board who is unable to attend a regularly scheduled meeting of the council or board, a teleconferencing connection at the member's place of residence where members of the public would not be permitted to be present? CONCLUSION A city is not required under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act to provide, as an accommodation for a disabled member of its city council or an advisory board who is unable to attend a regularly scheduled meeting of the council or board, a teleconferencing connection at the member's place of residence where members of the public would not be permitted to be present. ANALYSIS We are asked whether a city is required under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 12101 -12213; "ADA") 1 to provide a teleconferencing connection for a member of the city council or a city advisory board unable to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.