Opinion No. (2005)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralJune 1, 2005California3,239 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

BILL LOCKYER Attorney General GREGORY L. GONOT Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE BILL MORROW, MEMBER OF THE STATE SENATE, has requested an opinion on the following question: May a hospital district provide unconditional indemnification to non-employee members of its medical staff involved in litigation arising out of peer review committee activities? CONCLUSION A hospital district may not provide unconditional indemnification to non — employee members of its medical staff involved in litigation arising out of peer review committee activities. ANALYSIS The question presented for resolution concerns a proposed agreement under which a hospital district would agree to provide unconditional indemnification 1 to non — employee members of its medical staff who are defendants in litigation as a result of their activities as members of a hospital peer review committee. Typically, such a lawsuit would involve a staff physician suing committee members for defamation or for intentional interference with the right to practice a profession. (See Joel v. Valley Surgical Center (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 360 , 364 .) 2 We conclude that a hospital district may not enter into such an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.