Opinion No. (1998)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralJuly 15, 1998California1,155 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ANTHONY DaVIGO Deputy Attorney General

ZORAN K. BASICH, a professional law corporation, has requested this office to grant leave to sue in quo warranto upon the following:

Defendant Nextel (defendant Recomm did not make an independent appearance in these proceedings) denies the allegations and alleges affirmatively that relator signed a waiver of all express and implied warranties.

Code of Civil Procedure section 803 provides as follows:

"An action may be brought by the attorney-general in the name of the people of this state . . . upon a complaint of a private party . . . against a corporation, either de jure or de facto, which usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises any franchise, within this state. . . ."

This statutory remedy, in the nature of quo warranto, is concurrent with that provided by Corporations Code section 1801 whereby the Attorney General is authorized to bring an action to dissolve and forfeit the existence of a corporation that has seriously offended against a provision of the laws regulating corporations, has fraudulently abused or usurped corporate privileges or powers, or has violated any provision of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.