Opinion No. (2001)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralMay 23, 2001California3,895 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

BILL LOCKYER Attorney General ANTHONY S. DA VIGO Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE DARRELL STEINBERG, MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. Do the "whistleblower" statutory protections applicable to employees of state and local public entities supersede the statutes and rules governing the attorney-client privilege? 2. Do the statutory provisions relating to the disclosure of false claims actions, communications with the Legislature, and the filing of complaints or claims or the institution of proceedings pertaining to the rights of employment by employees of state and local public entities supersede the statutes and rules governing the attorney-client privilege? CONCLUSIONS 1. The "whistleblower" statutory protections applicable to employees of state and local public entities do not supersede the statutes and rules governing the attorney-client privilege. 2. The statutory provisions relating to the disclosure of false claims actions, communications with the Legislature, and the filing of complaints or claims or the institution of proceedings pertaining to the rights of employment by employees of state and local public entities…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.