Opinion No. (1997)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralMay 28, 1997California5,685 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General GREGORY L. GONOT Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. RAINEY, MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. When a county counsel takes a position in favor of the interests of the county board of supervisors and adverse to the interests of the sheriff, does a conflict of interest thereafter exist without the county counsel's declaration of such conflict so as to entitle the sheriff to legal representation in that matter by independent counsel? 2. Assuming a conflict of interest thereafter exists and independent counsel is to be retained in such circumstances, may the sheriff select the counsel and who would be responsible for the payment of attorneys' fees? CONCLUSIONS 1. When a county counsel takes a position in favor of the interests of the county board of supervisors and adverse to the interests of the sheriff, a conflict of interest may, depending upon the individual circumstances, thereafter exist without the county counsel's declaration of such conflict so as to entitle the sheriff to legal representation in that matter by independent counsel. 2. Assuming a conflict of interest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.