Opinion No. (1998)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralMarch 20, 1998California1,030 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ANTHONY M. SUMMERS Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. MACK, YOLO COUNTY COUNSEL, has requested an opinion on the following question: Does the $200 fee paid by a person granted probation for a crime of domestic violence constitute a "fine, penalty, or forfeiture" to which penalty assessment provisions apply? CONCLUSION The $200 fee paid by a person granted probation for a crime of domestic violence does not constitute a "fine, penalty, or forfeiture" to which penalty assessment provisions apply. ANALYSIS Penal Code section 1464 1 provides that "there shall be levied a state penalty . . . upon every fine, penalty or forfeiture imposed and collected by the courts for criminal offenses. . . ." Government Code section 76000 is similar, but applies to counties: "In each county there shall be levied an additional penalty . . . upon every fine, penalty or forfeiture imposed and collected by the courts for criminal offenses. . . ." The effect of these two statutes is to levy a penalty assessment of approximately 170 percent upon the amount of any "fine, penalty, or forfeiture." 2 The question we are asked to resolve is whether the payment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.