Opinion No. (2005)

Good Law
California Attorney GeneralJuly 14, 2005California2,237 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

BILL LOCKYER Attorney General SUSAN DUNCAN LEE Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE STEPHEN SHANE STARK, COUNTY COUNSEL, COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, has requested an opinion on the following question: Did the repeal of Streets and Highways Code section 905 in 1961 cause counties to obtain fee title ownership pursuant to the presumption of Civil Code section 1105 to any county highway where the deed conveying the land under the highway was ambiguous with respect to the interest intended to be transferred to the county? CONCLUSION The repeal of Streets and Highways Code section 905 in 1961 did not cause counties to obtain fee title ownership pursuant to the presumption of Civil Code section 1105 to any county highway where the deed conveying the land under the highway was ambiguous with respect to the interest intended to be transferred to the county. ANALYSIS Prior to its repeal in 1961 (Stats. 1961, ch. 1788, § 2 ), Streets and Highways Code section 905 ("section 905") provided: "By taking or accepting land for a county highway, the public acquires only the right of way and the incidents necessary to enjoy and maintain the same, subject to the regulations provided in this and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.