Goodwin

Goodwin v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers Ass'n

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 121·89 Cal. App. 306·264 P. 560
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1928Docket No. 4895.California1,504 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Valentine, J.

The above action was brought by plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Wm. H. H. Goodwin, deceased, to recover the sum of $2,771.96, which plaintiff claims is due him on account of oranges received by defendant from two properties formerly owned by said deceased. One property was located in San Bernardino County, California, and was known as the Moorman Hill or San Bernardino County property; the other was located in Riverside County and was known as the Iowa Avenue or Riverside County property.

The following facts are not disputed: That between December 14 and December 20, 1919, defendant and respondent entered into an agreement with said Wm. H. H. Goodwin, deceased, wherein and whereby defendant agreed “to pick, hand pack, ship and market all the citrus fruit now growing on his [Goodwin’s] land and all that, during the term of this agreement, may be grown upon his lands and premises.” It is conceded that the two ranches above mentioned were the lands and premises referred to.

The agreement was to continue for five years unless terminated on November 15th of any year by either party giving written notice during the last fifteen days of the preceding August. It is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.