Courtney

People v. Courtney

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 198·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 413·22 P.2d 741
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 1933Docket No. 2303.California1,582 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Archbald, J.

An indictment was returned by the grand jury of Los Angeles County charging Don Courtney, John Sullivan and John Joseph Courtney, who gave his true name as John J. .Creely, with the crime of extortion, in count I. In count II the accusation names the crime as extortion, but the statement of the acts constituting such offense describes the crime of robbery. The dates, the name of the victim and the amount of money are identical in both counts. Defendants Don Courtney and John J. Creely were arrested and arraigned, and at the time set for pleas, count II was amended by the court by striking out the word “extortion” and inserting instead “robbery”, without resubmitting the matter to the grand jury. At the time the indictment was returned defendant Sullivan was in Canada, so far as appears, and remained there until extradited. At the time set for the trial of Courtney and Creely the latter was present, but Courtney was not, and the trial proceeded as to Creely alone, who was convicted on count I and found not guilty on count II. Thereafter, defendant Sullivan was returned from Canada and Courtney was apprehended. Sullivan entered a plea of not guilty to the indictment. Courtney had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.