Morrice

North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Morrice

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 601·56 Cal. App. 145·204 P. 851
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 1922Civ. No. 2381.California1,742 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The action was brought to cancel a certain option or agreement for the sale of real property, and plaintiff had judgment from which the appeal is taken upon the judgment-roll. The instrument which the court ordered canceled, as far as necessary to quote, is in the following form:

Among the court’s findings are the following: “6. That the plaintiff received no consideration for the said option or agreement mentioned herein; that defendant, George Morrice, has not entered into possession of the said lands and premises in said option or agreement described, nor has he performed or caused to be performed any work thereon, nor has he made any payment on account of the purchase price thereof. . . .

“11. That by the terms of said option or agreement the said defendant, George Morriee, was given the option of purchasing the real property in said option or agreement and hereinabove described at the price and sum of $30,000 payable in installments as specified in the said option agreement. That defendant, George Morriee, has not paid to plaintiff any part of the said purchase price of said property provided for in said option or agreement and that plaintiff, prior to the commencement of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.