James

James v. James

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 75·80 Cal. App. 185·251 P. 666
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 9, 1926Docket No. 3140.California4,333 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

Action to quiet title to certain lots of land situate, lying, and being in the city of Los Angeles, county of Los Angeles. The action was originally begun against Howard T. James and Hortense James, his wife. Hortense James having died, the action was dismissed as to her.

The complaint is in the usual form of a pleading in an action to quiet title, alleges that the plaintiff is and ever since the month of August, 1922, has been the owner of the lots of land described in the complaint, alleges that the defendant claims some interest therein, and that the interest of the defendant is without right, etc. Judgment was prayed that the plaintiff’s title to said premises be quieted. The answer of the defendant denies the ownership of the plaintiff, and, by way of affirmative defense, alleges ownership of one-half interest in and to the described premises. This portion of the defendant’s answer, after alleging that the plaintiff and Thomas F. James were, during all the times mentioned in the pleadings, husband and wife and owners, as joint tenants, of property described in plaintiff’s complaint, is in the following language:

The answer then further alleges that said deed of Thomas F.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.