Ainsworth

Ainsworth v. Morrill

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 418·31 Cal. App. 509·160 P. 1089
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 1916Civ. No. 1922.California569 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

In this action the plaintiff sought to have reformed and then specifically enforced a written contract executed by and between the plaintiff A. G. Ainsworth and the defendant Morrill, for an exchange of certain real property. The defendant’s general and special demurrer to the plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint was sustained, and the plaintiffs declining to further amend, judgment was entered for the defendant, from which the plaintiffs have appealed.

The facts pleaded and relied upon for a cause of action are substantially these: The plaintiffs are, and at all times mentioned in the complaint were, husband and wife and living together as such in the county of Napa. The plaintiff Minerva L. Ainsworth was the owner of certain real property situate in the county of Napa, and the defendant Morrill was the owner of certain real property situate in the county of Alameda. Both properties were at the time of the making of the contract encumbered with mortgages, and the property of the plaintiff Minerva L. Ainsworth was further encumbered with a right of way and a homestead declared by her. The contract in controversy consisted of a written offer made and signed only by the plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.