Brashears

Brashears v. Giannini

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 706·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 820·22 P.2d 47
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 11, 1933Docket No. 683.California2,196 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Andrews, J.

This action is brought to recover that portion of the purchase price paid by plaintiff to defendant under a written contract entered into between the parties on the fourteenth day of December, 1929. The contract was for the sale of a large quantity of wine designed to be used for sacramental purposes, the wine being then in the possession of the defendant, it being stipulated that withdrawals or deliveries were to fully comply with federal and state prohibition laws.

The contract included sales of the same character made on previous occasions, which earlier sales were superseded by the last contract. All the dealings related to wine for sacramental purposes and the understanding of the parties was that the purchase was made by plaintiff for resale to rabbis. It was within the general knowledge of the parties that plaintiff had no permit to buy or take delivery of sacramental wine and that she did not contemplate obtaining permits for withdrawal to herself but that withdrawals were to be made under permits to be obtained by purchase from her.

Early in January, 1930, plaintiff, being advised that the contract was unlawful and that performance of the same was impossible by reason…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.